Skip to main content
Journals

The Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Microneedling for Melasma: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Authors: Narendra Kumar, PhD , Shangli Lin, MD , Amit Luthra, DNB , Tejas Patel, MD , Ashish C Bhatia, MD

Abstract:  Melasma is a chronic, relapsing hyperpigmentation disorder that is difficult to treat, particularly in Fitzpatrick skin types III-V, where energy-based devices frequently induce postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). Radiofrequency microneedling (RFMN) has emerged as a promising alternative because it targets dermal pathology while minimizing epidermal injury. Systematically evaluate the efficacy, safety, and mechanistic rationale of RFMN for melasma. A PRISMA 2020 compliant search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and LILACS (2014-2025) identified clinical studies evaluating RFMN alone or in combination therapies. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Owing to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, a qualitative synthesis was performed. Across 12 included studies, RFMN consistently improved Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) or modified MASI scores and melanin indices, with effects maintained up to 6 months. Histological evidence demonstrated reductions in dermal senescence markers and partial restoration of basement-membrane integrity. RFMN also showed a favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of PIH in darker phototypes. Combination treatment, particularly with low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG laser produced greater pigment reduction than monotherapy. RFMN is an effective and safe modality for melasma, offering advantages over pigment-directed lasers by addressing dermal mechanisms and limiting PIH risk. It may serve as a first-line energy-based therapy.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Related Articles

Resident-run clinics (RRCs) have become an important component of plastic surgery training. This study evaluates outcomes from a longitudinal RRC focused on neuromodulator and soft tissue filler injections over a 5-year period. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes, patient retention, resident experience by postgraduate year (PGY) level, and the safety of RRCs as a training model.
Hyaluronidase is often described as “dissolving” dermal filler, but this term oversimplifies how the enzyme actually interacts with long-standing filler within living tissue. This article explains why hyaluronidase more accurately modifies a complex filler–tissue system rather than completely eliminating filler, and why clearer terminology improves patient understanding, clinical decision-making, and ethical practice in aesthetic medicine.
Conventional botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) products include non-therapeutic accessory proteins vary in composition and manufacturing processes, which may contribute to differences in purity and biochemical characteristics. YY001 (Retoxin®) is a novel recombinant BoNT/A manufactured via E. coli expression to reduce impurities, improve purity, and minimize immunogenic risk.
Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) is widely used clinically; yet, its temporary effects require repeated injections that increase cost and inconvenience. There is limited rigorous evidence to support claims that repeated BoNT-A use alters efficacy. Unlike peripheral nerve transection, which causes irreversible denervation after 12 to 24 months, the long-term physiological effects of BoNT-A chemodenervation remain unclear.