Skip to main content
Journals

Socially Transformative Aesthetics: Real-World Evidence of Positive First Impressions After Pan-Facial Aesthetic Treatments

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Authors: Steven Dayan, MD , Julia K Garcia, PhD, MS , Nazanin Ashourian, PhD , Sara Sangha, PhD , Vaishali Patel, PharmD, MS

Abstract: Minimally invasive, pan-facial aesthetic treatments rejuvenate and improve facial appearance and may impact social interactions and perceptions. This observational pilot study used video recordings and in-person evaluations to assess social perceptions of participants before and after pan-facial treatment. Adults receiving pan-facial injectable treatments (ie, onabotulinumtoxinA [Botox Cosmetic, Allergan Aesthetics, Westport, Ireland], hyaluronic acid fillers [Juvéderm; Allergan Aesthetics, Irvine, California], or both) were invited to participate. Three measures were developed to assess perceptions of attractiveness, approachability, naturalness, trustworthiness, healthiness, and age from nonclinical observer, patient participant, and clinician perspectives: the Pan-Facial Treatment Outcome Survey, the Participant Perception of Appearance, and the Clinician Perception of Appearance. Twenty-seven participants received treatment and provided video recordings, with 16 videos (n = 8 participants) selected for the study; 298 individuals enrolled as nonclinical observers. Compared with baseline assessments, nonclinical observer–reported posttreatment scores were significantly higher for perceptions of attractiveness, approachability, naturalness, healthiness, and perceived age (all P values < .05). Posttreatment participant- and clinician-reported scores were significantly higher for the same domains as well as trustworthiness (all P values < .05). Compared with baseline, participants and the clinician perceived participants as younger compared to their actual age (3.6 years younger and 2.5 years younger, respectively), and nonclinical observers perceived participants as within 6 months of their actual age after pan-facial treatment. Pan-facial treatments may positively impact social perceptions and self-assessments of facial appearance. These benefits extend beyond physical appearance, including improving overall social interactions and personal well-being.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Related Articles

The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for inducing weight loss has increased in recent years, resulting in a parallel reduction in demand for bariatric surgery. Consequently, the need for patients to undergo aesthetic procedures, including aesthetic breast surgery, following successful GLP-1 RA–induced weight loss is expected to increase while the demand created by postsurgical weight loss is expected to decrease. The objective of this narrative review is to examine the literature on the use of GLP-1 RAs and other mechanisms used for medical weight loss to assist plastic surgeons in achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes with breast surgery after weight loss occurs.
Resident-run clinics (RRCs) have become an important component of plastic surgery training. This study evaluates outcomes from a longitudinal RRC focused on neuromodulator and soft tissue filler injections over a 5-year period. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes, patient retention, resident experience by postgraduate year (PGY) level, and the safety of RRCs as a training model.
Hyaluronidase is often described as “dissolving” dermal filler, but this term oversimplifies how the enzyme actually interacts with long-standing filler within living tissue. This article explains why hyaluronidase more accurately modifies a complex filler–tissue system rather than completely eliminating filler, and why clearer terminology improves patient understanding, clinical decision-making, and ethical practice in aesthetic medicine.
Energy-based devices are widely used for facial rejuvenation; as a result, an increasing proportion of patients presenting for facelift or necklift surgery have a history of prior treatment with ultrasound- or radiofrequency-based technologies. While the efficacy and safety of these devices are well established, their cumulative effects on facial soft tissues critical to deep-layer facelift surgery remain under-recognized.