Skip to main content
Journals

Socially Transformative Aesthetics: Real-World Evidence of Positive First Impressions After Pan-Facial Aesthetic Treatments

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Authors: Steven Dayan, MD , Julia K Garcia, PhD, MS , Nazanin Ashourian, PhD , Sara Sangha, PhD , Vaishali Patel, PharmD, MS

Abstract: Minimally invasive, pan-facial aesthetic treatments rejuvenate and improve facial appearance and may impact social interactions and perceptions. This observational pilot study used video recordings and in-person evaluations to assess social perceptions of participants before and after pan-facial treatment. Adults receiving pan-facial injectable treatments (ie, onabotulinumtoxinA [Botox Cosmetic, Allergan Aesthetics, Westport, Ireland], hyaluronic acid fillers [Juvéderm; Allergan Aesthetics, Irvine, California], or both) were invited to participate. Three measures were developed to assess perceptions of attractiveness, approachability, naturalness, trustworthiness, healthiness, and age from nonclinical observer, patient participant, and clinician perspectives: the Pan-Facial Treatment Outcome Survey, the Participant Perception of Appearance, and the Clinician Perception of Appearance. Twenty-seven participants received treatment and provided video recordings, with 16 videos (n = 8 participants) selected for the study; 298 individuals enrolled as nonclinical observers. Compared with baseline assessments, nonclinical observer–reported posttreatment scores were significantly higher for perceptions of attractiveness, approachability, naturalness, healthiness, and perceived age (all P values < .05). Posttreatment participant- and clinician-reported scores were significantly higher for the same domains as well as trustworthiness (all P values < .05). Compared with baseline, participants and the clinician perceived participants as younger compared to their actual age (3.6 years younger and 2.5 years younger, respectively), and nonclinical observers perceived participants as within 6 months of their actual age after pan-facial treatment. Pan-facial treatments may positively impact social perceptions and self-assessments of facial appearance. These benefits extend beyond physical appearance, including improving overall social interactions and personal well-being.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Related Articles

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely used for lip augmentation; however, the safety and performance of injection techniques and instruments (needle vs cannula) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of HA injection techniques for lip augmentation and to assess patient satisfaction, injected volume, and associations with technique, instrument, and HA product.
Upper facial lines (UFLs), including glabellar frown lines (GFLs), horizontal forehead lines (HFLs), and lateral canthal lines (LCLs) are prevalent aesthetic concerns addressed with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A). IncobotulinumtoxinA, a highly purified BoNT-A formulation, is utilized for simultaneous UFLs treatment; yet, comprehensive synthesized evidence is limited.
Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is a biostimulatory injectable that restores midfacial volume through collagen neogenesis rather than gel-based filling. Controlled clinical evidence directly quantifying PLLA's volumetric efficacy remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of a Norberg Medical PLLA formulation for midface rejuvenation in a prospective, evaluator-blinded, split-face controlled study.
Energy-based devices are widely used for facial rejuvenation; as a result, an increasing proportion of patients presenting for facelift or necklift surgery have a history of prior treatment with ultrasound- or radiofrequency-based technologies. While the efficacy and safety of these devices are well established, their cumulative effects on facial soft tissues critical to deep-layer facelift surgery remain under-recognized.